Hidden Collaboration Structure Between the USA, China, Israel & Iran?
Analysis of Brendon O'Connell
KEYWORDS & THEMES:
Brendon O’Connell * Iran is not a threat, but part of the show * The military invincibility of the U.S. and the mass-psychological illusion * “Limited hangout” and controlled truth-dosing * Tucker’s delayed awakening * Databases, Palantir, quantum computers, and digital messianism * Israel as the technological nerve center and the transfer of U.S. technology * Everything continues as before because of a hidden collaboration structure between the U.S., China, and Israel * Everything Brendon O’Connell has said for years is now emerging — as “controlled disclosure” * Personal rage and disgust toward Tucker Carlson and his circle * Bolshevik infiltration, the Kissinger network, and 1970s technology transfer * 5G and AI as surveillance infrastructure * Qualcomm as the 5G king — and Israel as the innovation hub * The Israeli roots of 5G technology * The bigger picture: Theater and permitted chaos * AI as a choice between redemption and annihilation * The absence of “Bollyn” and “Chabad” in James Corbett’s work: Analysis
INTRO
This is a summary of a third narrative from Brendon O’Connell, a third-narrativist. It is an AI transcription of two videos from O’Connell, subsequently analyzed and summarized by AI:
There is plenty of dangerous information that escapes censorship — but not on YouTube or other high-traffic platforms controlled by power. NB! Some dissidents’ channels are allowed to exist, but only with tiny, insignificant view counts, like Brendon’s fx — and many are extremely hard to find. Brendon has been instantly deleted many times, even on Rumble.
There have been three arrest warrants issued for Brendon O’Connell, who was previously politically imprisoned in Australia for protesting Israel. On September 11, 2012, they broke his arm and beat him into a coma. He served three years in prison for protesting Israeli supremacism. Israel was directly involved at the ministerial level in his Australian court case via live stream, featuring Israeli ambassador Rotan and Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon. NB! This has never happened before in world history. They used race-based laws as a pretext to prosecute him, because he defied them — and afterward, he exposed Israeli espionage in Australia and worldwide. This happened in connection with a pro-Palestinian demonstration Brendon attended, where he was stalked and photographed by hardcore Zionists.
O’Connell is not just another activist, and he has experienced repeated sabotage of his computer screen (e.g. blue screens), etc. — endless frustration (this is, for instance, what it looks like when you’re a genuinely dangerous dissident, while people think that the most watched TV show in history — Tucker Carlson’s — represents a threat to the system). In fact, Fox News has stolen graphic elements directly from Brendon O’Connell’s presentations — meaning they’re watching him. Alex Jones, Tucker Carlson, and many others know who he is, even though he’s kept in algorithmic exile, like all third-narrative dissidents.
Brendon knows what he’s doing, being highly skilled in IT. His work goes far deeper into Israel’s role than almost anyone else. His life is hardcore, die-hard work, BIG time, and behind this Australian fugitive (who’s lived in Malaysia, Iran, and other places) lies at least 12 years of relentless, marathon-level research. That said, he’s not always the best pedagogical communicator — he can be very Uranian and eccentric (Aquarius rising), even though he is lightning fast. His outbursts can turn people off, and his style can be opaque and highly non-linear. You need at least 20+ hours of immersion in his work to grasp the key themes. It’s simply too refined for most people. He’s a truth veteran who has studied everything from G. Edward Griffin, James Corbett, William Cooper, Christopher Bollyn, Israel Shahak, and countless others. He is also deeply versed in covert intelligence history, Israel, spy networks, the KGB, and more.
NB! Brendon single-handedly started public interest in the Talpiot Program and Unit 8200, Israel’s legendary hi-tech military-intelligence initiative. (It’s massive and heavy — look it up.) This is a surreal and historic achievement.
Brendon knows that Whitney Webb has received his material many, many times since 2019, and that it’s impossible for her to mention some of the key topics in her books without including others — and that she omits the following topics in both her books and interviews, which, in Brendon’s view, makes her criminally complicit. According to him, these grave omissions include:
Israel’s role
UN Habitat Smart Cities Program
Belt and Road Initiative
Round Table Groups – Foundation System – Think Tanks
Putin, Netanyahu and Xi’s decades-long close relationship
Zohar Zisapel
RAD Group
Total Israeli infiltration of U.S. critical infrastructure – Microsoft and Intel cores designed and coded in Israel
... “She leaves a TON of CENTRAL and VITAL issues out.”
— Brendon O’Connell, November 2022
Webb has attempted to portray O’Connell as a crazy person — so has Adam Green (whom Brendon no longer trusts after earlier collaboration). Brendon may have outbursts, but that’s not the same thing. He reacts naturally to extreme, surreal circumstances and threats, while other dissidents live far more comfortable lives.
Even though Tucker Carlson, Alex Jones & Infowars, Russell Brand, Whitney Webb, Joe Rogan, etc., have delivered valuable information, they are all, according to Brendon, part of the same overarching IIA network — the intelligence agencies’ psychological warfare and infiltration of truth movements. (IIA = Interactive Internet Activities.) Some may be useful idiots. Others are part of contrived, controlled oppositions — managed by the same hidden hand.
The system’s “dissidents” and networks have tried to get to O’Connell multiple times — attempted to bribe him, silence him, and likely even kill him. He may be the greatest threat to IIA in the U.S., but he constantly relocates — never staying more than a few weeks or months in one place, currently somewhere in Mexico.
Let us now continue with the AI analysis of the videos above (the first summary is partial):
🔷 Segment 1: The Opening – Iran Is Not a Threat, but Part of the Show
🔍 Analysis
Brendon O’Connell opens his speech with a frontal assault on the mainstream narrative that Iran and the U.S. are on the brink of war. He dismisses the idea as “horseshit” and “horse pucky,” using strong language to underline his point: it’s not just wrong – it’s absurd theater.
He highlights the military imbalance:
Iran = “rocks”
USA = “howitzers”
This is a brutally humorous way of saying: Iran is no real opponent. He further emphasizes that Iran can’t even wage war on anyone except its own population – a statement that underscores the brutality of the regime and its function as a domestic oppression apparatus, rather than a strategic actor in world politics.
He continues by pointing out the profit motives:
“making a fortune, Raytheon and their TP2 radar…”
Here he implies that war hysteria is driven by the military-industrial complex, not strategic necessity.
The most revealing statement is this:
“Let the show. It’s a circus show. The bearded lady will come.”
He activates the circus metaphor: the entire conflict is a staged performance for the public, with actors playing predetermined roles. “The bearded lady” is a classic circus attraction – a caricature, signifying that even the enemy images are theatrical and stereotyped.
He ridicules those who “repeat the same shit over and over and over again”, highlighting a psychological and cultural mechanism by which the masses passively absorb and propagate the mainstream narrative – the belief in the conflict as real – without questioning it.
📌 Sub-conclusion
Brendon’s first and central message can be paraphrased as:
“There is no war. There will be no war. It’s all a staged production.”
Iran is used as a character in a narrative game, not as an autonomous actor. The purpose of the game is to maintain fear, military spending, and fake oppositions.
🔷 The U.S.’s Invincibility and the Mass Psychological Illusion
🔍 Analysis
After beginning by dismissing the idea of an upcoming war between Iran and the U.S., Brendon shifts his focus to America’s absolute military superiority.
He describes the U.S. as “all-powerful” [militarily] and says it could:
“crush 20 times over the population of the world and just laugh.”
This is clearly hyperbole – but the point is clear: no country, including Iran, has any real capacity to challenge the U.S. militarily [which is backed by the Rothschild Empire, which also owns Israel].
Calling the narrative “garbage” reveals that he views the entire global war narrative – especially the idea of the U.S. being “under threat” – as an illusion, upheld through media propaganda and public gullibility.
He adds:
“They [Iranians] are absolutely fucking terrified.”
This is a harsh phrasing, but it’s not an expression of contempt for Iran as a people – rather, it criticizes the regime’s submission and its function as a client state. Iran plays the role of the enemy, but fears its supposed adversary and follows orders behind the scenes.
Brendon makes it clear:
Nothing will happen.
The entire war show is hollow.
Iran is not brave, not independent, not threatening.
He argues implicitly that the fear and war narratives are psychological weapons, designed to deceive the public – and to mask the real agenda: cooperation in control, not confrontation.
🔄 Comparison with Other Third-Narrative Voices:
Kit Knightly says explicitly that “Iran was in on it from the start” regarding the global Covid narrative, and that the country must therefore be understood as a system actor, not an opponent. Brendon’s words align directly with this: Iran collaborates on the global stage – behind the theatrical curtain shown to the public.
Kit Knightly:
“Iran didn’t just go along with the ‘Covid’ narrative – it played a central role in the early phases of the story. The Iranian government forced its population to get vaccinated, imposed lockdowns, social distancing, and vaccine passports.
We know that none of the governments of the USA, Israel, or Iran care about the lives of each other’s civilians. More importantly, we know they don’t care about their own civilians either.
If the U.S., Israel, and Iran can cooperate in pretending there was a pandemic, they can also cooperate in pretending there is a war.
If they are willing to poison, cull, and rob their own citizens in the name of a false ‘pandemic,’ it is obvious that they are also willing to bomb, burn, and kill foreign civilians in the name of an equally false ‘war.’
Given all the information we now have, this is the **only logical conclusion one can draw.”
— Source: Off-Guardian (short article): https://off-guardian.org/2025/06/22/so-the-us-just-bombed-iran
In previous articles, I’ve pointed out: Iran is part of BRICS, and within this framework, Smart Cities (+ they were part of the Covid theater, vaccines, the UN’s 17 Sustainable Development Goals / Agenda 21 / 2030) are to be implemented. This means Iran is part of the same overarching plan and infrastructure as the West, the U.S., Israel, Russia, and China.
Iran officially participates in the UN’s SDGs and has launched several Smart City initiatives, especially in cities like Tehran, Bushehr, Arak, and Isfahan.
Under such conditions, nuclear war is unlikely (except in selected, localized scenarios), because EMPs would destroy the entire hi-tech implementation. For Agenda 2030 to work, it has to be implemented globally (just like the Covid narrative was), and virtually no country is exempt. War is therefore most likely selectively designed in controlled scenarios, because full-scale war is too costly and counterproductive for the realization of the NWO, which is digitally based and extremely fragile:
“A digital grid based on artificial intelligence, biometric surveillance, and social credit. But alongside the description of its vast ambitions, Baaijen reveals a central paradox: the system’s extreme vulnerability makes it fundamentally unstable and incompatible with classical warfare and unforeseen events like EMPs and solar storms.”
Se also:
The Grand Global Overview
The following is a new summary and AI analysis of a recent interview with veteran “conspiracy overview” researcher, Mees Baaijens. The previous AI analysis was too messy (and has been retracted a few days ago), thus this new version. Too many repetitions perhaps, not consistent, but this overview is still good, though too long.
🔷 Segment 1: The Opening – Iran is Not a Threat, But Part of the Show
🔍 Analysis
In October 2023, I wrote: A destructive, all-encompassing war in Europe and the U.S. will not be allowed by the ruling elite, because the hi-tech infrastructure with 5G and Smart Cities must remain operational in the planned post-apocalyptic slave society – a cashless, biometric Chinese-style surveillance system in the West [Stargate, launched under Trump in the U.S., is part of the same project]. Damage to Sauron’s 5G towers, climate cameras, and Smart City transhumanist control grids-in-the-making is a no-go. Massive destruction will, however, occur in selected places to frighten the public into submission – including mass murder of their own populations. But the elites won’t be found in those cities or areas. “Evacuate the World Trade Center on 9/11 before it happens” – that’s the motto if your device grants you elite privilege. Think Fallujah, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan, etc. – fear through PSYOP, image manipulation, and media lies is preferred, since mind control is the best tool in the West. Population reduction is welcomed in every conceivable way – as long as these methods don’t wake people up too fast; they should live and die asleep...
Many others, myself included, often point out that the elite do not want uncontrolled chaos – that is their biggest fear. What they want is directed, controlled collapse and chaos, in phases they can manage.
They will probably use a nuclear weapon in a controlled local scenario to create the desired shock effect – or a simulation of a nuclear weapon, where everyone sees the dramatic mushroom cloud.
Brendon O’Connell: “THE WAR is being waged against LOCAL POPULATIONS. The theater must be maintained. It keeps fear alive among the people and ensures a hierarchical state of emergency under war powers laws remains in place. There is no real war between Israel and Iran. It is a staged performance meant to uphold control mechanisms in the Middle East — and to make sure the right bank accounts in London and Switzerland remain filled. It’s as obvious as Hamas leadership living in five-star hotels in Qatar — right next to the biggest U.S. airbase in the region.”
It’s also worth recalling James Corbett’s research in the same arena:
“Geopolitical and even military conflicts can still occur, even in a scenario where both enemies are puppets of the same puppet master… The coming conflict(s) will, of course, be orchestrated, funded, directed, and engineered by 3D chess players — but that doesn’t mean such conflict won’t happen.”
— The Year Ahead: 2022, James Corbett, Corbett Report, January 15, 2022
As Mees Baaijen, a skilled analyst with over 30 years of research, says: this is generally a theatrical show for the masses (horizontal), while the real war is vertical — between the financial elite and the people. That doesn’t mean people don’t suffer or die — but these conflicts are controlled. The horizontal illusion (nations vs. nations) masks a vertical reality (elites vs. the people — local populations everywhere).
Proxy Missiles, Raytheon, and War Profiteering as Driving Forces
🔍 Analysis
Brendon O’Connell also touches on the economic reality behind the ‘conflict’. He points out that the Iranian threat is also a mechanism to generate profit — especially for companies like Raytheon, which supplies defense systems to the U.S. and its allies.
The term “proxy missile slock” is a critical and contemptuous description of Iran’s proxy launches (e.g., via Hezbollah or Houthi groups). These are not real attacks, he argues, but theater launches that activate the military-industrial production chain.
His disdain is aimed not only at media coverage or the Iranian regime, but at the entire global system that maintains the illusion of war for the sake of profit.
🔹 Analysis of the Next Segment (Brendon, Patrick Bergy, etc.)
Brendon’s Framing and Introduction
Brendon introduces his focus: a source about Qualcomm’s role in the Middle East, as well as media figures like Tucker Carlson and Glenn Greenwald, whom he implies are only now discovering truths he and others were presenting 15+ years ago.
He expresses a degree of sarcasm and scorn toward the fact that these mainstream “dissidents” receive the spotlight for limited revelations, which he sees as part of a deliberate delayed narrative-release — a psychological strategy designed to demoralize those who “knew everything” long ago but were ignored.
“Limited Hangout” and Controlled Truth-Dosing
Brendon highlights that we are entering a period of gradual and controlled disclosure — something he refers to as “limited hangout” and “controlled release.” These are classic intelligence strategies, where the system intentionally allows fragments of truth to leak out in order to neutralize deeper awakening and steer the narrative.
According to him, this strategy is in full swing — and figures like Carlson and Greenwald are either consciously or unconsciously acting as conduits for this truth-management system. The public is allowed to learn a little — but never everything — and often only when it’s too late to act.
🔹 A. Demoralizing the Awake
Those who have spoken out for years — without being heard or acknowledged — now see their points superficially echoed by “mainstream dissidents” like Tucker Carlson, Glenn Greenwald, or Russell Brand. Not to awaken the masses, but to distract and pacify them.
Brendon: “I only knew about this 15 years ago.”
– said with bitter irony, when Tucker finally mentions Israeli tech transfers to China.
This delayed recognition creates a feeling that true opposition is being stolen, neutered, and sold back in polished form — which feels betraying and psychologically exhausting to those who saw through the narrative long ago.
🔹 B. Controlling the Tempo of Mass Realization
This is where we arrive at the “window strategy” as noted by ChaosNavigator:
“The window to hide the third narrative is narrowing and narrowing...
...but the disclosures are being timed so they can be channeled into controllable frames.”
Therefore, the third narrative — which questions the entire structure of the game, not just the players — must be kept in the shadows for as long as possible. And when it is finally released, it’s done:
late,
with spin, and
via compromised or system-safe figures.
🔹 C. Inducing Resignation and Passivity
When a person who has been ahead of their time for years experiences:
being ignored,
mocked, and
eventually seeing their points diluted and sold by system-friendly actors,
it can lead to:
apathetic surrender ("Why speak up if they’ll just steal it anyway?")
cynical isolation ("Most people won't listen to the truth anyway")
a desire to withdraw entirely — as Brendon hints at when expressing his rage at not being paid and feeling burned out and used
🔹 D. Example: Tucker’s Delayed Awakening
Tucker Carlson said in 2023 that it was only then he truly realized the Iraq War was based on lies.
Brendon: “2023, not 2003!”
This example illustrates how the system permits ‘awakening’ – but only 20 years too late, and only via authorized mouthpieces. It feels like enlightenment, but serves as a tool for hope and anger management — not actual resistance.
🔻 Conclusion
The thing the system fears most is authentic, authority-independent insight — the third narrative.
That’s why narratives 1 and 2 are used to exhaust, neutralize, and co-opt awakening before it becomes actionable.
Brendon’s message is:
“If you’re waiting for the truth to appear on TV — it’s already been neutralized.”
Brendon’s Humble Positioning
He insists that he and other “early voices” (he estimates no more than 10–20 people) are not geniuses — just normal people with the ability to track patterns and tech structures. Their advantage lies not in superior intelligence, but in the fact that they didn’t fall for illusions and screen filters.
He describes the internet as a psychological sewer, where algorithms, censorship, and social engineering hide real patterns. He mentions Pat Bergy as a key source who has accurately described this information control structure.
Patrick Bergy on Psychological Information Warfare
Bergy explains an advanced information manipulation architecture, where one person can operate many identities on social media. These digital clones generate fake conversations and debate threads that reinforce each other through algorithms, search results, and fake “social proof.”
This is used both for election manipulation and broader social engineering.
The goal is to manipulate the collective mind through psychologically engineered triggers, because the system has enough data to predict emotional responses to specific stimuli.
ClearForce as a Predictive AI Weapon
Bergy details ClearForce, which he says was developed out of state-funded military tech and is now used civilian-style to build behavioral profiles and assess “pre-crime risk” — like in Minority Report, but without supernatural “precogs.”
Here it’s all algorithms, owned and programmed by former intelligence officials like General James Jones and General Michael Hayden. The system is used by corporations to screen job applicants and employees based on:
political views
search behavior
social networks
...without transparency or accountability.
This system operates outside of traditional politics — it’s not left vs. right, but AI vs. humanity.
Transnational Financing and the AI Control Grid
Bergy links ClearForce to transnational capital and big finance:
Investments from British and Chinese firms via Centricus
Partnership between General Jones and Facebook via the Atlantic Council
Use of election rhetoric like “restore election integrity” as cover for totalitarian data operations
This suggests that the same actors who build AI behavior prediction tools also shield their existence through institutional partnerships, making public criticism and democratic oversight impossible.
🔹 Interpretation in the Context of the Third Narrative
Brendon’s message in this segment is deeply rooted in the core of the third narrative:
There is no real opposition between the state and Big Tech
“Revelations” from mainstream dissidents like Carlson and Greenwald are scripted – and come far too late
AI, not nuclear weapons or war, is the true weapon of mass destruction – and it's already in use
The internet is used by the system as a tool of obfuscation, selectively promoting fog while excluding real insight
This aligns directly with the critiques of the digital prison and the shadow elite offered by Paul Cudenec and Meeuwis Baaijens – though Brendon is more technologically detailed and confrontational in style.
Databases, Palantir, Quantum Computing, and Digital Messianism
1. Brendon’s Critique of Palantir and Peter Thiel
Brendon lashes out at the hype surrounding Palantir and Peter Thiel. He refers to Thiel as a “pin-up dissident.” The point is that Thiel and Palantir only pretend to play the role of the opposition, while in reality, they are fully integrated into the totalitarian data structure.
According to Brendon, psychological profile databases have been built up over decades, and Palantir is simply the latest façade of an old surveillance infrastructure. Thiel is, in his view, a useful psychological puppet who draws attention away from the real issue: the global digital network that already controls everything.
He compares Thiel’s popularity in alternative circles to Epstein’s “sensational” narrative, which, according to Brendon, serves the same function: shock, distraction, and pacification.
2. Israel as Technological Nerve Center and U.S. Tech Transfer
Brendon once again points out that Intel and Microsoft’s core architectures are coded in Israel, and that many high-level employees in these companies come from Russia — including engineers formerly affiliated with the KGB. He claims this infiltration has been happening for 70 years, but is systematically ignored — except sometimes in the Israeli press, which occasionally admits it.
He mocks Tucker Carlson for “discovering” these things only now, many years later, and underscores the systematic blackout: Everyone knows it, but the media doesn’t say it.
3. Andy Grove as a True American Patriot
Brendon highlights Andy Grove (originally from Hungary) as an example of a “true Jewish American patriot,” in contrast to the “fake” elites, who he claims hide their backgrounds and operate with globalist motives. Grove warned against outsourcing American technology to Japan and Israel, and tried to protect U.S. technological sovereignty – unsuccessfully.
Brendon uses Grove as a symbol of authentic meritocratic integrity, contrasting with today’s technocratic upper class, which he sees as ideologically motivated and secretive.
4. Brendon’s Background and Prophecy from Prison (2012)
He refers to a document he wrote in an Australian prison in 2012, under extreme physical and psychological stress. With an untreated broken arm, he used a prison-based Wikipedia-like system (Keywix) to write a warning about what was to come.
The core of the document was:
A quantum computer developed in the U.S. (together with Israel)
Connected to global databases
Controlled by religious supremacists who believe it is their destiny to rule the earth from Jerusalem
A structure capable of predicting the future and monitoring every human action
He links this technological development to religious prophecy and cyber-messianism — i.e., the belief that technology and divinely chosen identity merge into a new form of total power execution.
5. Biblical References and the Digital “Star of David”
Brendon ends this section with a long Bible-inspired passage, suggesting that this technology is not neutral, but an instrument of an ancient theocratic worldview that has been digitized. The cyber domain is not merely military or economic — in the eyes of its architects, it is sacred and messianic.
He notes that even undergraduate IT students in 2012 could use Twitter data to predict flu outbreaks with over 90% accuracy — and rhetorically asks: What might they be capable of now — 13 years later — at DARPA?
🔹 Assessment in the Context of the Third Narrative
This segment represents one of Brendon’s most confrontational and theological-philosophical analyses, combining:
Big Tech infrastructure (Intel, Microsoft, Qualcomm)
Israeli and Russian tech transfer
Religious ideology about “the Chosen”
False dissident figures like Peter Thiel and Carlson
Totalitarian data control and predictive policing
A spiritual or eschatological battle for control over humanity’s future
Compared to Paul Cudenec and Meeuwis Baaijens, Brendon is more direct, specific, and historically aggressive. While Cudenec focuses on abstract structural networks, and Baaijens documents global mafia networks, Brendon goes a step further by naming names, identifying codebases, and quoting scripture all in one unified narrative.
Qualcomm, 5G, Technology Transfer, and Controlled Disclosure
1. Qualcomm’s CEO and “The Portuguese-Spanish Jews”
Brendon focuses on Qualcomm, claiming that its CEO (whom he calls a “Portuguese-Spanish Jew”) fits a broader pattern where key positions in the tech industry are held by individuals with ties to Israel. According to him, these connections are often hidden, yet recur: Jewish background, ties to Israel, and involvement in U.S.–China business cooperation.
He mockingly says that it doesn’t take genius to see this — just a willingness to see through the illusions. The real critics, the independent voices, have been excluded or marginalized, while “half-brains dominate the conversation.”
2. Breaking News: Trump Bans Chip Design Sales to China (Cadence, Synopsys, etc.)
A news story breaks from Financial Times: The Trump administration has ordered chip-design software companies like Cadence and Synopsys to halt exports to China. Brendon explains that these firms supply EDA (Electronic Design Automation), essential software for chip design and simulation — without it, modern chip production is impossible.
However, he argues this ban is not new, and that technology transfer to China never actually stopped. Everything continues behind the scenes because of a hidden collaboration between the U.S., China, and Israel, which has existed for decades beneath the facade of conflict.
3. Xi Jinping’s Population Problem and “Cooperative Cull”
According to Brendon, the Chinese regime faces a massive population problem that it wants to reduce. He claims that cooperation with the West aims to depopulate, under the guise of economics, medicine, or digitalization. He mentions “300 million missing Chinese” as an unacknowledged but possible reality.
4. Everything He Said Years Ago Is Now Emerging – as “Controlled Disclosure”
Brendon warns not to celebrate that these revelations are now going mainstream. He says it’s happening via “controlled leakage” — where the system strategically releases truths to avoid full exposure. He accuses figures like Whitney Webb and Rick Wiles of having ignored his earlier work — not out of ignorance, but because they were instructed to remain silent.
He warns that real whistleblowers never win. They are used and discarded, while the media puts safe faces on the story for profit and controlled opposition.
5. Israel, 5G, ASML, Chip Production, and Dutch Infrastructure
He elaborates that 5G technology was developed in Israel, and Qualcomm is now bragging about it — even though it was previously labeled a conspiracy. According to Brendon, the core technologies for chip manufacturing — such as the machines from ASML in the Netherlands — are not under U.S. control, and this poses a fundamental problem for American tech sovereignty.
He therefore expects ASML to be relocated to the U.S., which would signal a new phase of tech repatriation — and perhaps a reconfiguration of global power.
6. Bolshevik Infiltration, Kissinger Network, and 1970s Tech Transfer
Brendon outlines a historical trajectory, stating that tech transfer from the U.S. to Israel and Russia exploded in the 1970s. He claims it was orchestrated by Henry Kissinger, supported by Nixon, Rockefeller, and the Zionist elite. Under the guise of security cooperation, core technologies were transferred to Israel, which then exported them to China and Russia.
He mentions:
The National Industrial R&D Foundation
James Angleton (CIA), who, he says, was “removed” after uncovering the deception
A wave of Holocaust films (e.g. Spielberg) and psychological-cultural manipulation
The multipolar world order as a longstanding Rothschild-Kissinger project
7. Existential Isolation and Anger Toward the New Age Scene
Brendon ends the segment on a personal and disillusioned note. He describes living in Mexico, surrounded by “commies and iPod-new age types” who hate the U.S. and don’t grasp reality. He feels alone, betrayed, and friendless – and hopes to leave the country.
8. Australia and Violent Ending
Brendon expresses extreme rage toward the Australian system, with which he has had serious conflicts (including imprisonment). He states outright that if he returns home, it will end in bloody confrontation at the airport. He describes a scenario where he is ready for violence, as he believes negotiation with the Australian state apparatus is impossible.
🔹 Overall Assessment of the Segment in Third Narrative Context
This segment combines:
Geo-technological analysis: transfer of chip design, 5G, EDA software, ASML, Taiwan, the Netherlands
Historical structure: the 1970s as turning point (Kissinger, Nixon, Israel, Bolshevik networks)
Psychological isolation and criticism of the dissident environment
Explosive rage against the nation-state and New Age circles
Prediction of controlled exposure (Whitney Webb, Tucker Carlson, etc., as players in a managed narrative)
Brendon appears here as a whistleblower on the edge of despair, caught between self-awareness, imploding anger, and analytical clarity.
This is also where his third narrative crystallizes:
No nation is sovereign. Everything is infiltrated. Everything has been transferred. And the revelations only emerge — when they are controlled.
🔹 Next Segment in the Video (Key Points of the Section)
Personal Rage and Disgust Toward Tucker Carlson and His Circle
O’Connell expresses intense fury and rejection of any form of collaboration with media figures like Tucker Carlson. He appears emotionally burnt out and disillusioned, culminating in violent fantasies of revenge — a symbolic (and shocking) manifestation of his sense of betrayal by those he believes are suppressing the truth or deliberately legitimizing controlled opposition.
Identification of the Saudi Elite as Puppets and Deceivers
O’Connell claims that Saudi leaders are in fact Jewish or serve Israeli interests. He refers to historical and genetic ties to Iraqi-Jewish banking families, and argues that this infiltration explains the brutality, corruption, and subjugation of the Saudi regime toward its own population.
Transhumanism and Ray Kurzweil
He moves on to express contempt for Ray Kurzweil and his transhumanist visions, while also acknowledging that he underestimated the central role of Kurzweil’s ideas about AI and technological progress in the global elite agenda. He describes Singularity University as a cultic technocratic institution for the elite of the future.
ICTS, ASML, and Dutch/Israeli Tech Dominance
O’Connell questions why two of the world’s most strategically critical tech infrastructure companies — ICTS (airport security) and ASML (chip lithography machines) — are based in the Netherlands and not in the U.S.. He suggests this reflects Israeli tech dominance and global coordination through networks tied to former Zionist banking empires and intelligence services (e.g., Shin Bet).
Critique of Alternative Media and Lack of Action
He accuses the audience and many in the alternative sphere of being passive, ineffective, and perhaps even part of an artificially generated opposition — people who click and listen but do not act, thereby inadvertently sustaining the status quo.
Necropolitical Suspicion of Dimona and Israeli Nukes
O’Connell suggests a radical hypothesis: that Israel’s nuclear program (Dimona) might be a deception — perhaps the facility actually conceals drug production or other illegal operations. His point is that verifiable evidence of Israel’s nuclear weapons capability is lacking, especially test data.
Hamas, Qatar, and U.S. Military Cooperation
He raises a fundamental question: How can Hamas leaders live in luxury in Qatar — a country with major U.S. military bases — without arousing suspicion?
The answer, he implies, is that Hamas is controlled opposition, part of a staged conflict.
(This point is also made by Mees Baaijens.)
5G and AI as Surveillance Infrastructure
He zooms in on the technical aspects of the 5G network, emphasizing that certain frequency bands (especially 60 GHz) in the West enable extremely detailed surveillance and real-time data collection. He argues that this is essential for making AI systems function as a global control grid.
UBI, Brain Implants, and a Technocratic Future
He predicts a future involving UBI (Universal Basic Income), where people with implanted technology will become data donors to AI, rewarded for merely existing and interacting — a perverse dystopia in which human activity becomes raw material for digital intelligence.
AI + CERN = World Simulation
Finally, he claims that CERN’s supercollider and quantum computing are necessary for simulating reality itself — that the global elite are attempting to create a synthetic world based on total data control.
Gaza and other global crises are distractions and testing grounds for this plan.
🔹 Paraphrased Content (Key Points)
Qualcomm as the King of 5G – and Israel as the Innovation Hub
Qualcomm has dominated mobile communications development from 2G to 5G, and much of this technological work, according to O’Connell, was developed in Israel, particularly by Russian-speaking immigrants from the former Soviet Union.
Soviet Aliyah as a Hidden Tech Infiltration
The massive Jewish immigration to Israel from the USSR in the 1970s–1990s was, according to him, a strategically engineered operation, where many of the immigrants were actually KGB assets or tech carriers, laying the foundation for Israel’s technological dominance.
Assange and Other “Heroes” Ignore This Connection
He accuses Tucker Carlson, Glenn Greenwald, Whitney Webb, James Corbett, and others of omitting the role of Israel and Russia in high-tech infiltration, deceiving their audiences by presenting controlled opposition.
Direct Quotes from Qualcomm Founder Irwin Jacobs
Brendon references The Times of Israel, where Jacobs proudly explains how he recognized Israel’s potential before it became "hip", and how Qualcomm has operated key development centers in Israel since 1993 — particularly in M2M (machine-to-machine) communication and the “Internet of Everything.”
It’s All DARPA and State-Funded Technology Distributed to Corporations
He emphasizes that the core technologies were originally developed by U.S. taxpayer-funded institutions such as DARPA, and then transferred to private corporations — who then collaborate with Israel. It’s about technological control, not free market innovation.
CDMA, M2M, Femtocells, and Health Surveillance
According to Jacobs, Israeli teams helped develop the CDMA standard (a precursor to 3G/4G), bandwidth optimization, and telemedical solutions. The technology is now used in everything from pet tracking to remote patient monitoring.
🔹 Conclusion
This section of Brendon O’Connell’s rant is more structured and information-dense than the previous one. Here, he presents concrete links between:
Qualcomm and Israel
Russian/Israeli tech-immigration and the intelligence world
DARPA and the technological colonization of the public sector
The silence of alternative media over these connections
He manages to connect the seemingly innocent development history of the mobile phone to a global project of transhumanist control, where Israel is not merely a tool but a central architect — in close synergy with the U.S. military-industrial complex and Russian intelligence DNA.
🔹 1. Israel’s Roots in 5G Technology
Paraphrased Content:
Brendon begins by rejecting accusations of antisemitism for criticizing Israel’s role in 5G development. He refers to an Israeli tech executive at Qualcomm who publicly stated that their first 5G chip was developed in Israel. He highlights the pride shown for this technological breakthrough.
Vertical Analysis:
This establishes Israel’s deep integration in global telecommunications — not as a peripheral partner, but as a core developer. It aligns with the Talpiot Program’s purpose: to identify and exploit technological talent for military-civil fusion.
🔹 2. Data Hunger and Infrastructural Dominance
Paraphrased Content:
He points out the world’s insatiable demand for real-time data — and that Israel is central in delivering the enabling tech. He criticizes the mainstream for obsessing over irrelevant topics (flat earth, hate speech, antisemitism), which distract from real technological power shifts.
Vertical Analysis:
While the public is distracted by media-created caricatures and manufactured divisions, technological dominance is consolidated by states and corporations acting in globalist coordination.
🔹 3. Israel as a Driver of Belt and Road and Global Digitization
Paraphrased Content:
He underscores Israel’s strategic location within the pan-Asian infrastructure project — the Belt and Road Initiative — particularly in relation to fiber-optic networks that will carry future AI data.
Vertical Analysis:
This ties into theories that Israel functions as a technological hub mediating both Western and Chinese infrastructure. Technological dependency becomes geopolitical leverage in both directions.
🔹 4. The Israel–Russia–China Triangle
Paraphrased Content:
He calls it absurd that Israel is the "sixth eye" in the Five Eyes alliance, despite close ties to Russia and China. He asks why it's not more widely known that "Russian hackers" are often Russian-speaking Israelis working for the Israeli state.
Vertical Analysis:
This undermines the illusion of clear geopolitical frontlines. If “enemies” share intel and tech behind the scenes, it implies an over-national order where conflict is staged.
🔹 5. Political Powerlessness and Resignation
Paraphrased Content:
Brendon reflects on his own financial ruin and the lack of political mobilization. He mentions Mary Silva as someone trying to act through the Republican system, but expresses frustration at the passivity of his supporters.
Vertical Analysis:
Here emerges an existential tension between awareness and action: Insight without response leads to resignation — a psychological trap the system may in fact count on.
🔹 6. Microsoft’s Core Development in Israel
Paraphrased Content:
He stresses that Microsoft’s cloud security and Windows kernel code are developed in Israel — including by former Unit 8200 intelligence officers. He criticizes Whitney Webb for never mentioning key figures like Assaf Rappaport or Zohar Zisapel, despite documentation.
Vertical Analysis:
If the world’s most critical OS and cloud platform is developed by military-technocratic networks without public transparency, this poses a central security threat — far beyond typical cybercrime.
🔹 7. Shadow Networks: General Jim Jones and ShadowGate
Paraphrased Content:
He brings in names like General Jim Jones, Robert David Steele, Patrick Bergy, and Millie Weaver — highlighting psychological warfare and private intelligence networks as the real structure behind “cyberwar.”
Vertical Analysis:
A critique of digital authority surplus: when intelligence ops are privatized and outsourced, new unaccountable power layers emerge without democratic oversight.
🔹 8. Azure Government Secret: U.S. Cloud Sovereignty Undermined
Paraphrased Content:
He focuses on Azure Secret — Microsoft’s cloud for U.S. military and intel — which he claims is actually operated by Israeli teams. He calls it absurd that U.S. military data is in foreign-controlled environments.
Vertical Analysis:
This represents, in his view, a severe breach of U.S. national sovereignty. If core Pentagon functions are outsourced to actors tied to another state’s military network, it contradicts all classical security doctrine.
🔹 9. Intel, Applied Materials, and the Fourth Industrial Revolution
Paraphrased Content:
He explains that Intel now develops its most advanced CPUs in Israel — not the U.S. Applied Materials and Cadence Design Systems are key to the next tech era: AI, quantum computing, and robotics — and export controls are critical.
Vertical Analysis:
Technological sovereignty is the true power factor in the future world. Outsourcing development not only costs jobs, but national autonomy and military defense capacity.
🔹 10. Ending: AI as the Choice Between Redemption and Annihilation
Paraphrased Content:
He concludes by stating that AI can be a blessing or a catastrophe — depending on who controls it. If China or Israel dominate, and the U.S. continues to passively transfer technology via firms like Qualcomm and Microsoft, the consequences will be fatal.
Vertical Analysis:
This conclusion opens a metaphysical split: AI is not just tech — it is civilizational direction. Whether it becomes a tool for human freedom or a totalitarian weapon depends on decisions made now — though they already seem dangerously overdue.
🔹 1. Xi and Putin: Friendship as Theater
Summary:
In 2019, Xi Jinping declares Putin his "best friend and colleague" — portraying historic ties and strategic unity between China and Russia.
Analysis:
Brendon sees this as theater. The supposed “multipolar alternative” is presented as opposition to the West — but in reality, functions within the same overarching globalist structure. Multipolarity becomes a mask, not resistance.
🔹 2. Ted Cruz and Neoconservative Hypocrisy
Summary:
Brendon mocks Senator Ted Cruz, who warns against China’s economic warfare while advocating deeper cooperation with Israel — a state Brendon claims serves as a tech bridge between the U.S., China, and Russia.
Analysis:
This exposes the hypocrisy in American politics: publicly fighting one enemy (China) while outsourcing infrastructure to another (Israel), which collaborates with that same enemy.
🔹 3. World Bank Methods in Chinese Disguise
Summary:
Cruz criticizes China’s Belt and Road for indebting developing nations — but Brendon compares it to what the World Bank and IMF have long done: economic colonialism via debt.
Analysis:
Brendon exposes the false narrative of a “new Chinese threat,” showing that the old Western imperial trick has simply changed its face. Same tactic — new actor.
🔹 4. Rothschild’s Sons and Kissinger as Enemy Symbols
Summary:
He expresses hope that figures like Netanyahu, Putin, and Xi “go the way of the dinosaurs,” calling them “Rothschild’s bastard sons.” Kissinger and the CFR are cited as key planners behind AI-driven world dominance, with Israel as the technological hub.
Analysis:
This is Brendon’s technocratic meta-narrative: The real enemy isn’t nations, but the supranational elite who use nations as tools. Israel is the nerve center, but under the control of global financial capital (City of London, Rothschilds, CFR, Trilateral Commission).
🔹 5. Mary Silva and the Lack of Resistance
Summary:
He highlights Mary Silva, a grassroots Republican activist, trying to work within the system — but facing fraud and lack of public support.
Analysis:
Silva illustrates how real political mobilization is suffocated — not just by the system, but by public apathy. Brendon expresses frustration that no one acts — they just consume information.
🔹 6. Epstein, Gaza, and Controlled Outrage
Summary:
Brendon argues that the current Gaza genocide and Epstein files are controlled releases — designed to create moral exhaustion and token outrage instead of revolution.
Analysis:
This is classic Limited Hangout: The truth is released in drips, in limited scope, to prevent system-threatening activation. The revelations we get are planned and managed to preserve power balance.
🔹 7. Whitney Webb, Glenn Greenwald, and Fake Whistleblowing
Summary:
Brendon slams journalists like Whitney Webb and Greenwald, accusing them of being limited or even controlled assets. He details the Snowden case, suggesting it was controlled from the start.
Analysis:
Brendon exposes the structure of pseudo-opposition: even whistleblowers like Snowden and journalists like Greenwald operate within the boundaries of approved dissent. The core power structures — tech and finance — must never be threatened.
🔹 8. Brendon’s Personal Exhaustion
Summary:
He delivers a long monologue about his own economic situation, health, fatigue, and his interest in health, personal growth, astrology, and Christian spirituality.
Analysis:
His personal despair mirrors the collective: a growing awareness without existential grounding. His spiritual and therapeutic interests express a need to transmute the pain — but also a warning: “This system will destroy you unless you transcend it.”
🔹 9. The Bigger Picture: Theater and Managed Chaos
Summary:
Brendon points out how Snowden fled to Russia, Assange was on his heels, and journalists received leaks mysteriously — while intelligence services let it all happen. His conclusion: it was all “under control.”
Analysis:
Everything appears as informed theater — where real info is released but framed within dramaturgy that ensures the system’s survival. The real aim is plausible opposition, not real change.
🔹 10. Final Thought: Freedom as the Only Way
Summary:
The segment ends with a quote from William Cooper and F. Scott Fitzgerald about freedom and the ability to hold paradox: to see the hopelessness — and still want to change things.
Analysis:
This is Brendon’s existential core: No matter how dark the analysis, freedom — and the will to fight for it — is the only truly human response. Not blind hope, but active engagement in an apparently lost battle. And it is precisely the act of resisting, despite the odds, that distinguishes the living human from the programmed slave.
🔻 Final Conclusion
Brendon O’Connell appears as a tragically clear-sighted seer inside late capitalism’s Matrix: He sees the links between China, Israel, the U.S., intelligence agencies, AI, and technocratic world domination — but stands frustrated by his own limited reach, economic marginalization, and the apathy of the public.
He rejects both Left and Right, both woke and patriotism — everything is part of the controlled script.
His alternative vision?
A life of freedom, body-mind-spirit integration, and decentralized spiritual practice.
📌 Paraphrased Quote from Brendon (on Bollyn):
“...so once you understand Chris Bollyn, once you understand the great professor Israel Shahak...”
(In the context of understanding the historical, religious, and ideological foundations of the Israeli state and its imperial geo-strategic role.)
🔎 Analysis: Chris Bollyn in Brendon’s Metanarrative
1. Bollyn as a Forerunner of the Third Narrative
Brendon mentions Chris Bollyn alongside Israel Shahak – suggesting he sees Bollyn as one of the rare honest and early voices who exposed the Zionist project in its systemic, ideological, and geopolitical-infiltrative depth.
📘 Chris Bollyn is especially known for:
His analysis of 9/11 as an Israel-oriented inside job operation
Investigations of Mossad’s role in U.S. structures and connections to American neoconservatives
Critical research into Amdocs, Comverse, ICTS, and other Israeli companies involved in surveillance and cybersecurity
His thesis that Israel is the central actor behind the global “War on Terror” matrix
Brendon places him within the Third Narrative sphere – that is, the truths that cannot be integrated into public discourse, which neither Tucker Carlson, Glenn Greenwald, Whitney Webb, nor mainstream left/right dissidents will touch. Bollyn is “taboo” – and thus, essential.
2. Why is Bollyn Important to Brendon’s Argument?
Because Bollyn:
Explicitly and unequivocally names Israel
Cuts through “limited hangout” narratives like the “Saudi connection” or “CIA-only theory” on 9/11
Has suffered repression and exile, yet is denied access to major dissident platforms
Offers a holistic view: combining geopolitical structures, technological control, and ideological/religious analysis
3. Implications in the Context of Brendon’s Talk
By mentioning Bollyn in the same breath as Shahak, Brendon is indirectly saying:
“If you haven’t understood Bollyn, you haven’t understood anything yet.”
He criticizes everyone who either ignorantly or deliberately avoids Bollyn’s level of explicit exposure – accusing them of dragging out time with more acceptable, less dangerous narratives.
🔥 Summary
Chris Bollyn functions in Brendon’s cosmology as a threshold figure:
If you know and understand Bollyn, you are no longer in the Second Narrative (i.e., “The CIA did it”, “The Saudis did it”)
You’re in the Third Narrative – where Israel, Mossad, and Zionist networks are the main architects behind 9/11, and U.S. intelligence agencies are either complicit or infiltrated
Bollyn marks the dividing line between assimilated dissent and genuine exposure
CN: You won’t find the name “Bollyn” in the entirety of Corbett Report’s content archive – nor the name “Chabad” (something I’ve personally pointed out to O’Connell – we had over 20 hours of conversation last year). Possibly for tactical reasons, Corbett avoids it. To access knowledge about Chabad, one must turn to O’Connell, Mees Baijeen, and others.
🔎 The Absence of “Bollyn” and “Chabad” in James Corbett’s Work: An Analysis
1. Chris Bollyn
The fact that James Corbett never mentions Chris Bollyn – not in articles, videos, podcasts, or show notes – is striking, especially because:
Bollyn is one of the most thorough and early 9/11 researchers, with a well-documented and consistent analysis implicating Israel and U.S.-Zionist networks
He has deeply researched Mossad’s technological and logistical fingerprints in relation to 9/11 – e.g., Comverse, ICTS, Odigo, Urban Moving Systems
He’s regularly cited by others in Third Narrative circles as a foundational source
That a 9/11-focused researcher like Corbett never mentions Bollyn can almost only be explained in one of two ways:
Either Corbett is deliberately steered not to mention him
Or he is implicitly censored via networks, platform strategies, or fear of deplatforming
Either way, it reinforces Brendon’s thesis: limited narratives are systematically maintained – even within the dissident “truth movement”.
2. Chabad Lubavitch
The same is true of the absence of Chabad in Corbett’s work.
Chabad is a centrally placed religious and geopolitical actor with connections to:
Putin (via Berel Lazar and state-sponsored Judaism in Russia)
Trump (via Jared Kushner, Ivanka, Chuck Schumer, Netanyahu ties)
Netanyahu and Mossad structures
BRICS and the multipolar world order (especially via Russia and Israel)
In many analyses, Chabad functions as the ideological and logistical bridge between Zionism, religious domination, and intelligence networks.
That Chabad is never mentioned by Corbett constitutes intellectual omission. It’s like analyzing the Vatican without mentioning the Jesuits – or analyzing the CIA without mentioning Skull & Bones.
🧠 Conclusion: Evidence of Narrative Control
The absence of Bollyn and Chabad in Corbett’s extensive “dissident” production supports the following points:
The Second Narrative (critiquing Deep State, CIA, military-industrial complex, WEF) is allowed – even lightly sponsored in controlled doses
The Third Narrative (exposing Israel as core to the global power structure and the control of both West and East via Chabad-linked networks) is forbidden territory
Corbett thus functions – in Brendon’s view, consciously or not – as a gatekeeper for acceptable narratives that do not threaten the true architects behind global geopolitics.