I Kina råber de 'Give me Liberty or Give me Death'
En udfordring for magtelitens Nye Verdensorden
Give me Liberty or Give me Death', råber enorme menneskemængder i Kina for tiden. Sandsynligvis pga kineseren som råbte sloganet, og som var med til at starte oprøret i Kina (han blev befriet af civile fra Politiet, som forsøgte at arrestere ham).
Det er virkelig historiens episke ironi, at lige netop dette revolutionære amerikanske slogan fra 1775, bliver en ny fællesnævner for frihed i kinesisk historie anno 2022. Sloganet har desuden været meget brugt igen af amerikanske ‘konspirationsteoretikere’ disidenter i 10’erne, og er af universel menneskelig erfaring, da det er opstået mange hundrede år før 1775.
Først en synkromysticistisk og astologisk note:
Jeg tjekkede op på astrologien og datoer, and lo and behold: Det er virkelig historiens episke poetiske ironi, at ikke nok med, at Patrick Henry er oprindelsen til dette identiske slogan i en tale af 23. marts 1775 i USA, som var afgørende for Den Amerikanske Revolution 1776, men at Pluto, planeten for transformation, var næsten samme sted som nu, 2022 (slutningen af Stenbukken) lige før 1776, hvor Pluto trådte ind i Vandbæreren 1778. Magtens planet i frihedens tegn.... Vi befinder os samme sted nu.
Here comes the kicker by serendipity: 23. marts 2023 træder Pluto ind i Vandbæreren igen for første gang i næsten 250 år. Nøjagtig samme dato som da Patrick Henry i 1775 udtalte ordene 'Give me Liberty or Give me Death'....
Wow, how is that for poetic synchromysticism and justice.
Der kan siges meget om dette - Pluto er bl.a. lige netop en eklatant signifikator for dette slogan, siden det repræsenterer liv/død i den ekstreme betydning.
Jeg tør godt spå, at dette arketypiske slogan vil binde mennesker sammen i USA og Kina og hele verden i de fremtidige altafgørende slag mellem de 99,99% VS magteliten 0,1%.
Kaos bliver det først, men det bliver IKKE magtens sindssyge Nye Verdensordens Ordo ab Chao (Order out of Chaos)!
I Vesten er vi også slaver gennem mange årtier, men er hjernevasket til troen på, at 'vi er frie - hvilket er en del af slaveriets og magtens mediers mind control i en levealder, da man fandt ud af at åbenlyst diktatur var uholdbart qua at det medfører dødsforagt og omstyrtelse til sidst, hvorfor demokraturet opstod som magtens damage control - men erkendelsen dæmrer, og det er den erkendelse som vil spredes big time, og nå et crescendo i fremtiden....
En dag i fremtiden vil magthavere og diverse monstrøse Mette Mao-typer tage sig totalt antikverede og frastødende ud, så alle og enhver ÅBENLYST kan se de historiske bedrag.....omend prisen for menneskehedens sejr over løgne og morderisk magt kan blive høj.....
Ref: 'Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death': Protests Swell In China Against Covid Lockdown, 'Step down, Xi' Slogans Chanted
https://news.abplive.com/news/world/give-me-liberty-or-give-me-death-protests-swell-in-china-step-down-xi-slogans-chanted-1566263
Protests Hasten China’s Exit from Its Disastrous “Zero-Covid” Policy
DETTE ER MEGET STØRRE END BERLINMURENS FALD.
Kyndige iagttagere siger, at de ALDRIG har set folk befri arresterede fra politiet i Kina. Manden som råbte op om Corona-Kejserens idioti ved at sammenligne VM fodbold-forhold og Covid-svindlen, at Kejseren intet tøj har på - han råbte GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH!- og blev BEFRIET AF CIVILE! Se videoen:
Det sker ikke i Kina, for det er ikke sket før. Det er meget radikalt og signalerer nye toner.
Så var der branden, hvor mange af de indespærrede døde i bygningen, vi ved ikke hvor mange (inkl. børn) , og dette fik mange til at gå rasende amok med dødsforagt. Det har spredt sig alle steder i Kina.
De har vogne som jammer al kommunikation, som de kører ind i områder, hvor info som regeringern ikke bryder sig om spredes. . Apple hjælper Kinas magtelite med at knuse oprøret ved at have deaktiveret Airdrop på Apple devices (vestens sindssyge dæmoniske magtelite hjælper Kina, som Corbett, Iain Davis, m.fl. har redegjort for).
Dette er begyndelsen på enden., Damn if you do - damn if you don't.
"Wuhan tonight. Enough is enough with the CCP’s suppression! - Kevin Galalae: "China is falling apart. Extraordinary developments!"
Vi må håbe de forhindrer dette: China Is Building The World’s Largest Quarantine Camp In Guangzhou with 90,000 Isolation Pods — This Is The World Economic Forum’s ‘Role Model’ For The Global Community
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/11/china-building-worlds-largest-quarantine-camp-guangzhou-city-90000-isolation-pods-world-economic-forums-role-model-global-community/
Skæbnens enorme ironi: Kineserne - dvs. fodfolkets oprør mod den kinsesiske magelite - kan hjælpe borgere i Vestens land. De kan smadre Rothschild og Co's kontrol og tidsplan med at implementere kontrolsystemet i Vesten, hvis Kinas magtelite ikke knuser kinesernes oprør .Ny event upcoming: 1..2..3. Vesten samarbejder med Kina på de højeste planer (James Corbett), og en ny megaevent vil blive iværksat af Vestens dæmoniske magtelite, dersom Kina ikke får kontrol over oprøret.....
“Protests in China are not rare. What *is* rare, are multiple protests over the same issue, at the same time, across the country. The protest below, apparently in central Beijing’s liangmaqiao, is astounding”
Then we in the WEST need the realization that Rockefellers and Rothschild are responsible for China's technate - den afsindigt skarpe Iain Davis:
"Nor did David Rockefeller, as evidenced by his 1973 op-ed for the New York Times. He and his Chase Group banking empire delegation had visited Maoist China. In his account of the trip, Rockefeller dismissed the mass murder of millions as “whatever.” It was the product of genocide that Rockefeller was interested in:
One is impressed immediately by the sense of national harmony. [. . .] There is a very real and pervasive dedication to Chairman Mao and Maoist principles. Whatever the price of the Chinese revolution it has obviously succeeded, not only in producing a more efficient administration, but also in fostering. [. . .] a community of purpose.
The Trilateralist Rockefeller could see the opportunity the Chinese dictatorship presented the parasite class. In full agreement with Brzezinski, he wrote:
Too often the true significance and potential of our new relationship with China has been obscured. [. . .] In fact, of course, we are experiencing a much more fundamental phenomenon. [. . .] The Chinese, for their part, are faced with altering a primarily inward focus. [. . .] We, for our part, are faced with the realization that we have largely ignored a country with one-fourth of the world’s population.
The “we” Rockefeller referred to was not us. He meant the G3P and his fellow “stakeholder capitalists” and Trilateralists.
The totalitarian order in China impressed him as he hoped it would. He wasn’t the first Trilateralist to see the technocratic possibilities in China. The sheer scale of the market was an enticing prospect and the promise of the “Technetronic Age” raised the real potential to build the world’s first Technate.
Completely discounting the appalling loss of human life, Rockefeller wrote:
The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history. How extensively China opens up and how the world reacts to the social innovation. [. . .] is certain to have a profound impact upon the future of many nations.
The Great Leap Forward
The G3P’s task was to crack open the Chinese market while supporting ongoing totalitarian rule. China would need help with its economic development and technical support to build the technological infrastructure necessary for technocracy to work. This process had already begun, but with Rockefeller, Brzezinski, Kissinger and others committed to the cause, the target of constructing a Technate was firmly in the Trilateral Commission’s sights.
The Trilateralists set about assisting China to develop both economically and technologically, while remaining careful to avoid applying too much pressure for political reform. Totalitarianism was a system they supported and wanted to exploit. In their 1978 Paper No. 15 on East-West Relations they suggested:
To grant China favourable conditions in economic relations is definitely in the political interest of the West.. there seems to exist sufficient ways for aiding China in acceptable forms with advanced civilian technology.
In the same paper the Trilateralists announced that they weren’t entirely averse to helping China modernise their military capability, though they stressed this should only be for defensive purposes.
They accepted that a modern, militarised China might turn to expansionism and seek to regain territory it historically claimed as its own, in particular Taiwan. They judged this was a reasonable risk to take.
They were playing the great game. Human lives were of no concern."
- China: The World’s First Technate – Part 1
https://off-guardian.org/2022/11/25/china-the-worlds-first-technate-part-1